BelAmiOnline: Tommy Hansen & Steve Jennings

polkamatic. says:

I am always shocked on this website how every time without fail that a model with a foreskin appears that at least one person comments about disliking uncut penises. In Europe people find cut penises to be gross looking with their scar tissue and dried up head but we don’t comment on every blooming cut model (about 80% of the guys on here) to say we dislike cut penises. I’m sure you circumsiced men wouldnt particularly enjoy being told how inferior your penis looked everytime another circumsiced man appeared on the site, especially when the shoot is filmed in America where circumsicion is so worryingly widespread. Just think that in Europe it’s the cut guys that feel shy about their unusual penises and I’m sure you wouldnt like to feel yourself in that situation. I in fact hate the term ‘uncut’. It’s not a question of being uncut, it’s just a penis. When you chop part of it off you can then define it in terms of being severed.

bonerboy says:

December 14, 2009 at 8:11 am

Oh pish posh. I would imagine that Waybig is a US-based blogs, that most of the studios & sites that advertise here are American w/mostly American models — which probably explains why 80% of the men featured on here are circumcised. I would also imagine that in Europe, they are way more exposed to European-produced than American porn, so I can’t see how any of it ultimately makes a difference. Honestly though, as an American I really couldn’t care less what Europeans think of American mens dicks, which is why you don’t see me on any European porn blogs. If Euros want foreskin in their porn so damn bad, common sense would tell them to not look to American smut.

DanielM says:

December 14, 2009 at 10:19 am

agree!

instead of “uncut” and “cut”, how about “natural” and “mutilated”.