Amateur College Sex: Aiden & Josh’s Tag Team

Jonny Marzetti says:

So you’re saying there are some “powerful old-school subscribers” whose outrage over BB trumps the “masses” of subscribers? The same “masses” that have given some of the very hoghest user-ratings to ACM scenes that toy with BB before the condom comes out (or even post-orgasm, as in a few Dawson re-insertions)?

If I’m an ACM subscriber who tries ACS without first seeing blog pix here or elsewhere, and then I’m outraged because I find there is BB (with no pre-warning as you would find on the DVD sales page), would I be entitled to a refund? The answer is obviously, “when hell freezes over.” So much for respecting customer sensibilities…

Instead of playing these goofy games, and providing a feedback page that is never replied to unless the feedback is positive, why couldn’t Corbin Fisher provide a place for uncensored, online feedback, as BelAmiOnline does?

While BA’s bareback scenes are almost always among the very-highest-rated by users, they often have one or two lengthy outraged posts mixed in with the swarm of subscribers expressing delight (usually fully, sometimes cautiously). Of course, we all know CF would have a coronary before allowing user-feedback (particularly instantly-appearing and uncensored, as BA does).

As you know, some ACM scenes already toy with BB a little in the early stages of the fucking (and Dawson has done a few raw post-orgasm re-insertions)? Why are many of these scenes getting some of the site’s highest user ratings if viewers are bothered?

Jonny Marzetti says:

I see the need for one more clarification: My original post referred to the reasoning provided in this quote from elmtree (in the Chaosmen thread I provided a link to above):

“Actually, even tho I don’t like the policy, it really makes good business sense. CF realizes the best way to increase membership on the ACS site is to have the guys fuck condomless. It peeks our curiosity and makes us want to get a membership to ACS to see these condomless scenes. If not for the fact the scenes are condomless (i.e. Something different then what you could see on ACM) what would be a reason for most gay men to join this second site?”

Later elmtree also suggested the possibility that CF may be trying to avoid offending ACM members by doing BB there. It’s all in the Chaosmen-thread link I gave above.

Jonny Marzetti says:

@ porndog “At any rate, it’s all one big tease and mind game. And I HATE mind games. And I hate being manipulated.”

That sums it up, man!

When I look higher up in the thread and see stuff like, “Oh, but this is a TAG, not a BI-TAG,” and Teasing vs. Tasering vs. blah, blah, blah. WTF??

It’s getting to the point where subscribers will probably be required to take a CF BS-terminology exam to avoid a subscription up-charge. CF‘s site is so much about bizarre rituals. It’s really all such a crock.

And as for saving the male BB for DVD’s (aside from the ACS pussy-laden scenes), why is CF demanding that people who want to see that stuff use a non-instant-gratification medium that everyone else is moving AWAY from? And to make it worse, why is he charging an outrageous price for those DVD’s when everyone else is going very much in the OPPOSITE direction? I’m sorry, but the guy’s a dick. He’ll eventually learn when people start wising up and his business heads South — if that hasn’t already started. It could be in the supernova stage right now.

Jonny Marzetti says:

@Info Re ChaosMen, I’ve always thought “Edge” was kind of a dumb name. But other than that, I believe the only other “codename” they use is “Serviced,” common lingo that is immediately understood. But more generally and importantly, Chaos believes in porn truth and clarity, quite unlike CF. On the Chaosmen free tour there are ten or so hardcore screenshots of every scene, so you know exactly what you’re going to get before shelling out. You don’t have to just guess what “Edge” will get you — including whether or not you’ll see condoms. Not everyone sees a blog with detailed pix before signing up for a site!

Not that the blog will necessarily help when it come to CF: In one other post I have below (still awaiting moderation as I type this) I explain how I ended up signing up for ACS the first time by clicking through a porn blog’s pix of GUYS ONLY having raw sex, which took me to a CF sign-up page for ACS — again showing GUYS ONLY (softcore). Since it was very arousing and porn is a visual medium, I no longer clicked around to read the fine print. Instead I signed up, only to find minutes later that the scene actually included pussy (but no condoms). Only on CF…. Even here, he posts all these arousing pictures of Aiden and Josh (only) frollicking, before you get slapped by the fish.

And if you want to talk flakey and confusing terminology, just look at the sub-site names “Amateur College Men” and “Amateur College Sex.” Doesn’t ACM present “amateur college sex,” too? So the only thing really “amateurish” here is those sophomoric and confusing naming conventions. (The performers and the production are actually quite professional.) Definitely no (intentional?) confusion of that type on Chasomen or BelAmiOnline or the sites run by Jake Cruise.

I guess CF can also stand for Communication Flakiness. Or Condom Free, but only on pussy-laden ACS.