ChaosMen: Dario (Solo)

Dario is a cute bi guy. He is local and it surprises me I don’t run across more Hispanic guys since I am located in the heart of Texas. A photographer who works with mostly Latin type guys submitted himself and a few of his of own models.

Dario was one of the first guys to respond back, very eager to work, to come in and rub-one-off, and even play around since his sexual attitudes are so flexible.

I think he is more down to play with guys, but perhaps his friends aren’t totally aware of his interest in other dudes. Well, they do now as he talks about what kind of guys turn him on.

He is a horny guy, and loved playing with his rather large cock for us. He was eager to show-off his ass too, and it was super hot having this Latin-twink grind around on the bed, inviting all of us to come play with his hole.

Massive cum shot too as he was totally ready to spill his load!

Watch Dario (Solo) at ChaosMen.com

Rico says:

November 21, 2012 at 11:37 am

How appropriate. A turkey on Thanksgiving Eve.

Daniel says:

November 21, 2012 at 5:12 pm

Hahaha

endeeeff says:

November 21, 2012 at 12:26 pm

BiLatinMen.com is —-> that way.

Jay says:

November 21, 2012 at 1:32 pm

We’re lucky to get any minorities on CM on any given day. No need to be a douche.

Orion Hunter says:

November 21, 2012 at 1:38 pm

What an asinine comment. As if all Hispanic and Latino men should be relegated to just one site.

Now that I’ve gotten my indignation out of the way (lolzz), Dario is a little disappointing. Flat ass, mediocre looks (I’m luvin’ the lips tho’) and a body that looks slightly under-developed.

Not impressed at all. Maybe things will improve once he’s sucking, munching and fucking. Maybe.

elmtree says:

November 21, 2012 at 1:55 pm

Well said Orion (and Jay). A “little disappointing” sums it up well so ilk just leave it at that…

moondoggy says:

November 21, 2012 at 2:21 pm

Oh, I didn’t even get it at first. I thought endeeeff was saying that BiLatinMen was equally mediocre, implying that they (and CM) could do much better, which is probably true. I’m sympathetic to the diversity replies, but don’t let the fact that these sites do such a shitty job with promoting nonwhite beauty force you to accept a second-rate model. We deserve better.

dio says:

November 21, 2012 at 3:11 pm

totally removing any racial overtones from endeeeff’s comment, I kind of agree that ‘Dario’ fits the the sub-par standard of BiLatinMen.com. I mean LBR, Dario probs wouldn’t be hired for Maximo Latino . :-P

he has a nice dick, tho!

Orion Hunter says:

November 21, 2012 at 4:11 pm

Sub-par standard? By whose definition and through what prism? Maybe BLM doesn’t have the resources to design and maintain a glossy website with all the bells and whistles like the “Big 3,” or the big budget to do location shoots, or the deep pockets to keep an attorney on retainer, BUT they certainly have some models who are every bit the equal – and a few stunners who are superior – to anything you’ll see on the so-called “top-shelf” sites.

Btw, Maximo Latino has had some beauties too. Just because a site is low budget or operating below radar, doesn’t mean that it can’t unearth some spectacular gems every now and then. Hell, even TIM has a few doodz who could’ve worked for CF, SC, RB and especially CM – lol!!

dio says:

November 21, 2012 at 4:44 pm

@Orion Hunter, yeah, even CM (and BSB) manages to snag some shockingly out-of-norm-wheelhouse performers. But, realtalk: the breadth of their catalog is substandard. A hot scene feat. decent/hot guys (off the top of my head: Cocoa & Venom) is rare. Not to mention how passionless it all is.

and I was using ML as a counterpoint – the guys they hire DO tend to be of a ‘higher quality’ than BLM.

Orion Hunter says:

November 21, 2012 at 6:00 pm

@dio: If I understand you correctly, you’re asserting that BLM and Maximo Latino generally have sub-standard models in comparison to say, Sean Cody and Corbin Fisher. So, it’s the models themselves that are inferior in quality to those of the vastly superior top-tier sites, and that this is not in any way impacted or influenced by the photographers, set designers, directors, make-up artists, wardrobe people, editors/editing (including Photoshop), etc. available to the better-financed companies.

I submit that your assertion rests almost entirely on YOUR subjective POV and preferences and is absent any empirical or objective evidence. MY own subjective POV calls b.s. Check.

What say we judge these models INDIVIDUALLY (and not as part of a “catalog”) and completely independent of any particular site on which they appear? After all, beauty can be found in the most surprising places and anywhere you take the time to truly look. Ugliness too.

*Zen thought of the day – lol!!*

endeeeff says:

November 21, 2012 at 6:14 pm

Oh wow…didn’t expect THOSE kinda comments. Moondoggy and Dio are on track with what I’m saying.

dio says:

November 21, 2012 at 6:33 pm

@Orion Hunter, umm… it’s like you are reading my posts and seeing something wholly different… I don’t even. I’mma stop now, because 1) I’m not gonna argue ‘taste’ with you, and 2) I don’t wanna ruin you’re ‘zen’ state. :-)