Hector de Silva Fucks Jay Roberts in ‘Wet Hot’ at MenAtPlay

moondoggy says:

I must disagree, boyfriend. Clothed-male / naked-male is not a completely fringe fantasy, and yet very few sites cater to it. This is their thing, and they’re doing it pretty well here. The suit in the pool is kinda bizarre — the most they can do in that direction is to have them switch places, so that the one in the swimming suit is the one in the pool giving head. Otherwise, I clicked on this to hate on it, and every pic after the really weak cover image won me over completely.

The shot of Hector standing there with his dick out of his fly and Jay kneeling naked is mesmerizing to me.

moondoggy says:

I think guys either get it or they don’t when it comes to CMNM. But generally, at least for me, the fantasy has to do with a difference in power. When one guy is clothed and the other is naked, one of them almost always comes across as dom and the other as sub, though surprisingly it’s not always consistent which one is which. Usually the naked one seems more in heat and therefore more the lapdog of the clothed one.

http://67.media.tumblr.com/863253b71dae38d760da115943f1cb7b/tumblr_nov1kuydzW1t3yc74o2_500.gif

moondoggy says:

TOTALLY. There’s also the phenomenon of sub voyeurism and nakedness as a display of power. Herb Ritts, Bruce Weber, Mike Hancock, Dink Flamingo, Jake Cruise, and Bryan Ockert all created a paradigm in which the photographer could be the predator and the sub at the same time. Even though Bryan sometimes succeeded in making it more egalitarian, the majority of the time it was about looking at what you couldn’t have. The photographer involving himself in the scene meant that they could in fact “have” it, but every time that happened, it only served to reinforce the fact that the experience would be fleeting. For the photographer, it was about desire; but for the naked model, it was a transaction. That sounds depressing, but there really are ways to make that hot (especially, as with Mike and Bryan, when the photographer was undeniably appealing in his own way and not just a leach).

Clearly Justin Timberlake is not the “sub” in this image. Sadly, he’s not naked either, but you could imagine it going much farther without him ever losing the, um, upper hand.

http://41.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mblkim6Jm21qzwburo1_500.jpg

moondoggy says:

The names that I named were specifically in reply to Scrapple, in support of his argument that the naked guy can be the dom and the clothed guy the sub. I wasn’t saying that all of those guys were part of my CMNM fantasy.

As for the rant, that’s okay. But apart from any *specific* personality, I would encourage you to have an open mind about the mixing of body types. It’s sort of like that sketch on SNL about sexual harassment, where one average guy said something to a woman and it came across as harassment. Tom Brady said the same thing while not even wearing pants, and it was labeled good office etiquette.

I read in your assessment an implication that a young guy with washboard abs should feel sick or ashamed if he has sex with an older man who doesn’t have that kind of body. I’m totally not judging you if that’s how your fantasies are wired. I’m not even sure that’s what you’re saying because there are so many complicating factors (like specific reasons why those directors rub people the wrong way even off camera). But personally, I can imagine no two people that you could put in a scene and have me say that one of them should be ashamed unless the other one was known to be a bad person. The more porn challenges the premise that people only belong together if they look similar, the more I’m inclined to appreciate it.

http://st3.smut-tube.com/content/64/564/7798564/0.jpg

Alann6 says:

The Tarzan scene this week was outstanding.