GayHoopla: James Manziel & Collin Simpson Flip-Flop FUCK

Jon says:

Collin does have a competition soon which is why he’s bulking. Definitely not a fan of his now puffy face ☹️ Hopefully he will lose some weight after he’s done with his competition. Also those zits on his body are interesting….

Ivan Jimenez says:

Shoulda added Sean Costin & Derek for an aggressive fuck & bottom scenes!!!

L. T. says:

The hell is going on with Collin? Why does he look meaty and not beefy?

sam my says:

Well he said he likes taking it up the butt, especially in my fave position.

Cubankid says:

I’m fully aware of that, but this is porn not politics. Everybody has their opinions/beliefs, and while i may not agree with them, this is what makes America great is that we’re allowed to express them.

badgamer1967 says:

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/db967cc2e08aa5fb97d4114d127b46530f08d34be17b8b780afba4d071d283ab.gif

Louisbb says:

Who is jerking off?
We only watch porn, right?
Right.

No_No_No_Yes says:

LOL she said Str8-4-Pay. Does ANYONE really get how bloody stupid this is getting?

Louisbb says:

We still love one and other :P
At least opinions can STILL diverge in Trump’s America

McM. says:

This is basic market segmentation where income streams are classified by the demographics and strategies utilized to capture it. It is about how businesses operate so individual perspective is rather meaningless.

It doesn’t matter how you think of your money. To GayHoopla and other companies producing gay porn, your money is “gay dollars”. (In a broad sense; it is actually further segmented.) The material is being created and marketed to you b/c you are gay, and you being gay or interested in gay porn is what makes you a targeted consumer.

kctx says:

Unless they post it under there porn name or account,, how would you know what they are saying? You shouldn’t care either.

Rockhard says:

I mean these studios consider guys as capital. Potential avenues of revenue. Not even as people. So they don’t if they have shitty views and even hate their customers. Most porn studios would rather not waste the effort of time and money to vet these guys. If a muscle guy or fit dude is willing to stroke his dick or do more for little pay, then that for them is a win. It’s unfortunate but true.

Maniacal Zebra says:

That is an interesting superpower!

Me2 says:

I read your comments on the other thread and wanted to let you know I agree with you about the power of our dollars, especially when we pool our resources. Sadly, money speaks louder, faster, and longer than the right or moral thing to do.

I wondered about the age of some of those opposed to your thoughts. I’ve found in some conversations with colleagues that those too young to remember the height of the struggle for some semblance of rights are less likely to believe their active participation is crucial in maintaining them. At the same time some are very much in tune with what needs to be done.

Ptr says:

I think it may actually hard to attract gay guy into porn. Why? Because once their screen goes out, everyone on their circle will know, and they may labeled as “whore” or whatever you may call them. The straight ones could go back to their life relatively easy because their peers may not know their “other life”.

Sask says:

I is a long shot to say that all corporations are homophobic because they have some homophobic executives. Where does that put Apple, whose CEO, Tim Cook, is openly gay? There are many corporations who have corporate policies to support their gay and lesbian staff, eg. most, if not all professional services firms. Many will submit themselves to an annual audit by GLBTI organizations. There will no doubt be some homophobic staff to executive level, but it is company policy to be supportive of gay rights. It is not those corporations to which my comment was directed.

I am not sure why anyone would lump the USA with regimes in countries including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Uganda, Nigeria, Egypt, Russia, and India, for example, in relation to homophobia. Those are just a few countries whose legal regimes are homophobic in the extreme. Many American states have legislation proscribing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and same-sex marriage is legal in the USA. All of the countries I have listed actually have homophobic laws. You will not be stoned and killed in the USA just for being gay, but you will be, if caught, in at least Iran and Saudi Arabia. You can be jailed for “promoting” homosexuality in Russia, and if you are attacked there, you will not be supported by the state. Visitors to the USA are no longer barred entry if they have HIV. It is a long stretch to lump the USA with the examples, and others, when it comes to homophobia.

It is also a long stretch to lump big-mouthed executives into the same class as oppressive regimes. I did not do that. Anyone who makes that conclusion miscontrues my comment. When writing in English, that is why we use paragraphs, to separate different topics.

Sask says:

I agree that the models are nothing more than a means to an end, the end being sales of scenes or subscriptions, or whatever money-generating measure they use. As far as the studios are concerned, they need to know nothing more than the legal requirement that the model is over 18, and keep appropriate records to avoid legal issues that may arise. Any more vetting would be an unnecessary (for them) cost. And they will keep using the same models as long as the scenes in which those models appear are selling (or downloaded or whatever measure they use to gauge popularity, and therefore, income potential).

No_No_No_Yes says:

He is right up there with Claude.

Jebus Waffleburger says:

Of course it does. You have a way of thinking which isn’t perfectly hostile to anything which might benefit homophobest in even the most trivial, indirect, or temporary way, therefore you’re a privileged traitor who thinks only of yourself. That’s how it works according to you.