Sean Cody: Wallace

Colton, The Major Hussy says:

I like him. Nice smile and love the nipples and the slightly furry chest.

freater says:

Wow good job photoshopper, he looks like shit in the vid

Guy says:

Mixed bag with this one. He reminds me of the guy with the Russian name on SC. Who was it Dmitry?

J.D. says:

“Fuck I look like yes and you look like no”

Billy C says:

Tight bod? Check. Not ugly? Check. Fur? Check. Pubes? Check. Hardon? Check. No excessive tatts? Check plus (because none) Voice? Ooops. Okay, overall he gets passes on all the key criteria for me because the no-tatts gave him a plus and the voice was a miss. But all just meeting basics really doesn’t make someone we really will be CUMpelled to watch. PASS!

William says:

I think he is cute…hot body and really nice mushroom-head cock. Of course many people have different tastes, likes and dislikes…but I don’t get why some people, especially in the gay community, are so vicious in their comments and criticism. If they can do better in the looks department, etc., then let’s see their photos…and stop hiding behind a ‘no photo’ profile pic, or a fake model pic. I use my real name here and photo…man up! …Oh, and before you trash me, I would be the first to say, I’m just an average looking guy and certainly not model material. At least I can admit it. I love a hot guy like Wallace, but there is more to a person than the exterior. ;)

moondoggy says:

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ced59022b85cc2fce37824d984519c507c196d3e7242f2f7a542902d524e1791.gif

Yes! This looks like David 2.0 to me, though no way does he have David’s gift for ejaculating inside men’s asses. That kind of ability is divinely ordained.

We’re already onto Monday’s Sean Cody with no mention of Friday’s Chaosmen. I give up trying to understand that.

Louisbb says:

For me, one box is not checked; good teeth
He should really have them fixed.

No_No_No_Yes says:

Rub a lamp.

Louisbb says:

Brady Jensen, that was a blond beauty

Kermit says:

Yes, but not a great performer, except the film he did for Cocksure with Robert Axel which was exceptional.

Scrapple says:

Lol. Patch.

david david says:

I guess these models’ pull out game is strong. LOL! They need to relax. Ain’t nobody getting pregnant there.

Scrapple says:

How else is he going to reconcile sticking his straight dick in a guy’s ass if he doesn’t create this idea of penile detachment?

Billy C says:

Rub SOMEthing . . .

Billy C says:

Don’t ever discount GBN (Gay By Necessity) . . . LOADS of that in the military in my nearly 30 years. Of course, many of the GBNs “slid” to Curious and then to Bi and some to Gay . . . down that slippery slope called opening the mind.

Billy C says:

And your observation suggests another entire line, of which we know little – in this case not the gray area, but the plaid flannel area of Lezbos’ gradations of Lesbianity. I mean, it’s generally accepted that women are more open to opportunistic lezzing – whether that’s right or wrong, I have NO idea – I’m actually very glad I know little about the inner-workings of lezbos’ methods of self-assessment, self-classification and self-identification, much less how they function on a “gay-to-bi” and beyond scale. But seriously – one wonders sometimes.

Kidding aside, GBN is a HUGE thing in
– all boys’ boarding/prep schools
– military
– prisons
– hell probably
It’s just biology – we’re just pigs, that’s all there is to it, and if the need arises and the only opportunity is a large knothole in the wall . . . well, we know what happens!

Also not kidding, I think too much emphasis (and therefore power) is given to a term which is inconsequential by its widespread use by “our community”. I’m talking about criticism of using “queer”. While, taken literally, with its source etymology and meaning being “odd”, it’s objectionable to those who are insufficiently secure to allow that being “odd” is GOOD! The words “queer” and “fag” have no power over me – they simply (like many other words which can just be conveyance of non-offensive thought or, with intent, be confrontive or objectionable) exist in context of the intent of the utterer. Am I a fag? You fucking bet I am! Am I queer? Damn right I am. Am I a cocksucker? Every chance I get! Am I a fudge-packer? Ditto. Am I a gay man? No two ways about it. Am I a man? Essentially and perpetually. Am I a Marine? Perpetually, certainly. I am all of those and more, and unless someone intends to disparage me with any term used, it makes absolutely no difference to me.

Let’s just concentrate on Wallace being well-enough adjusted that he’s not able to cope with his enjoyment of his fellow man. And this from someone who said PASS . . . I guess he’s growing on me! LOL