GayHoopla: Randy Reno Fucks Adrian Monroe

GayManFighteroftheStraightMan says:

The worst Dr. Who btw

GayManFighteroftheStraightMan says:

I enjoy Science Fiction above all other genres, in fact, I wrote one of my papers on the dystopic comparisons of Asimov, Bradbury, and Huxley. Dr. Who is perhaps the most iconic Sci-Fi shows out there because the story telling possibilities are limitless. The doctor can literally travel to the furthest reaches of time and space, bear witness to the most incredible cosmic events or the most terrifying perversions of reality. It’s a show that questions the very nature of what might be possible, marvel at what might be out in the universe.

However, her season was marred with bad acting from Jodie Whittaker, who’s take on the doctor seemed to vacillate between a needy spastic to an autistic, incapable of talking to people. Which is strange because of all the previous incarnations of Doctor Who were well-versed in conversing with average civilians and capable of saying goodbye to friends. Next, the writing for the season was equally awful as exposition overshadowed any personal revelations the audience (me) might be able to glean. One of the cardinal rules of movies, tv, or theater is show don’t tell. Most, if not all the episodes, might as just be a cross grandmother wagging her finger as she passes judgement. Finally, the showrunner (or show editor) must have been inhaling industrial cleaners because they missed the point of having a normal companion to the doctor. The companion servers two purposes: being the voice of the audience to question what is happening and provides a foil to challenge the doctor’s opinions while giving a subtle moral counterpoint to the doctor’s perspective. True the companion might not be on the same intellectual level as the doctor, but they can see a situation clearer because they don’t carry around the emotional baggage that he does. In fact, the best companions (or at least my favorite ones) were not afraid to call him out on his bullshit. In her seasons, the entire entourage was passive and agreed with whatever she decided/acted. To the point where they were essentially “Yes” men who’s sole purpose was to massage her ego. Yuk!

My true ire lies with how Doctor Who was portrayed. This man is a veteran time traveler, the last survivor of his race, a man who’s essentially timeless, lived innumerable lives, had countless adventures, and forced to make horrific choices that have reshaped the fate of the entire universe. Experiences that left an indelible mark on him. Sure he might put on a jovial façade and his fashion is…unique if not laughable, but there is a darkness, sadness, and anger in the core of his character. Sure you might only catch glimpses of his ruthlessness, but when it does come out, it’s devastating. The doctor only acts like a bumbling imbecile to throw his enemies off, until it’s too late and he has the upper hand. However, the 13th doctor might actually be a real moron. She makes dumb decisions like venturing into a dangerous spiders lair to look for a missing man. Inserting herself into the lives of strangers, as if she had nothing better to do, while lashing out with creepy moralistic rants at people she sees as evil without comprehending the context or the circumstances of their lives.

tl;dr: The 13th doctor’s tenure felt cheap, manipulative, and unearned

GayManFighteroftheStraightMan says:

Correlation does not imply causation. I don’t hate Jodie Whitter because she is Doctor Who. I hate the Doctor Who she portrays. The primary reason I use male pronouns is because apart from the 13th Doctor, they were all males and still holds my positive associations.

I wasn’t a fan of the ad hominem fallacy in the first part, but your later comments regarding the previous doctors only serve to underpin and reinforce my arguments. What has the 13th Doctor added to the pantheon? I wait with breath that is bated

GayManFighteroftheStraightMan says:

You’re pettifogging your specious position and not addressing the crux of my argument. I understand you like her, and I respect your opinions. However, my response, while verbose, dictates why your opinion is wrong. Not saying I don’t enjoy debating the finer points of a great show, but I would prefer a stronger counterargument with examples of why my position is incorrect.

If you want to get to technicalities and bring side characters into the foray, then using that same logic, the entire Doctor Who (and subsequent Torchwood) universe should not exists since it breaks the one unbreakable aphorism of the show: there is only ever one Time Lord.

GayManFighteroftheStraightMan says:

I’m typically not this pugilistic unless I’m getting ready for court, but my disagreement with your opinion invites debate by providing evidence as to why my position is false or why your opinion(s) garner any merit. I’m genuinely asking for you to give examples as to why my well formed arguments lack virtue. Of course, I’d prefer it if you didn’t use logical fallacies, but that still remains to be seen.

On the whole, while I might disagree with someone, it does not mean I despise or think less of them. Your failure to sway me just points to your inability to craft a sound counterpoint on this issue. It’s nothing to be ashamed of considering for the most part, I agree with most of your opinions when it comes to gay porn.