MEN.com: Escaped Convict Chuck Conrad Fucks Enzo Muller in ‘Finding His Prison Bitch’

BeeBee says:

Someone implied here not long ago that it is rare when a female is not in a MEN scene. That is not what I had observed so I checked. I found that out of the 50 MEN scenes that showed up here when I did a search, about 10% had a female in them and about 90% did NOT. It remains curious to me as to why 10% seems like 90% to some. When a clothed woman is briefly present it is often in the sexually intense scenes in which guys become SOOOOO horny for each other that they MUST have one another NOW. No matter what, how, where, or who else is there. A girlfriend might be there, or wife, or female friend, or mother, or female stranger. Or it can be a boyfriend, or husband, or male friend, or father, or male stranger. In this such scene it is a male policeman.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/894146a07fe67ba0fd5de74dff77a0adbc64593410b192491ade16e7cd00e399.gif

BeeBee says:

One only needs a “safe space” if one sees the presence of a woman as DANGEROUS. In the 10% of the MEN scenes that a CLOTHED woman may be BRIEFLY present, they are used in a comedic type way. If there is a scene, for example, playing with the funny gay adage to “Ditch The Bitch And Make The Switch,” there needs to be a “Bitch” to be “Ditched”. Porn is not ONE way, but interestingly there are those who believe it should be, and it should be how they personally want for it to be just for them, irregardless of all the many different fetishes, fantasies, likes and tastes among Gay and Bi men. Instead of supporting the studio that best suits them, they want ALL the Studios to cater ONLY to their personal porn demands. That is SOOOOOOO Republican minded.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/edb81babd5f3ae62d47eac5f503ff0669b473cbe94d1b0b1e13acd5f67010494.gif

Gino Costa says:

Thank you. We don’t see women as “dangerous” when viewing gay porn; we see them as UNNECESSARY. I am not attracted to women, sexually or emotionally, in any way, shape, or form (and that includes women who have altered their bodies to present as an avatar of a man). When looking at porn, I only and exclusively want to see males.

BeeBee says:

Once again, who is FORCING you to watch anything? You SUBSCRIBE (on your OWN accord) to the Porn Studio that best suits YOUR preferences. MEN is but ONE Studio to choose from. This is where you can come to find what Studio you like best. You have found that MEN is NOT for you, because in about 10% of their scenes there may be a CLOTHED woman BRIEFLY included in a STORYLINE setup within which the men will be fucking. Is she a “Bitch” to be “Ditched”? Or is she someone to “Sneak Around”. You seem to selfishly think porn should exist ONLY for you. There are MANY different fetishes and fantasies, and some Gay and Bi men are SEXUALLY TITILLATED by public sex (and women exist in public) or “Sneaking Around” sex, or “Ditching The Bitch” sex. Why should their enjoyment be “THWARTED” by your belligerence to fantasies and fetishes that are not your own?
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/350fc67c5552c10395eac339ae5b3ffd99d5ce48a028eb2177786f0de5bb5892.gif

Globe Trotter says:

“And who is FORCING you to watch anything?”

And I quote from MEN’s website: “Since the launch of Men.com back in 2003, this game-changing studio and has been releasing the industry’s best gay porn videos.”

And I quote from WayBig.com: “The Place To Find Gay Porn Fast! Free Gay Porn Galleries, Gay Porn Site Updates, Gay Porn Reviews & Gay Porn Videos”

Now call me a fool, but as a GAY man looking for GAY sex, it’s not unreasonable to frequent a porn studio that claims to produce the industry’s best GAY porn, and it’s certainly not unreasonable to frequent the blog of a website that promises free GAY porn galleries, updates, reviews and videos. I’m quite certain that I did NOT choose to visit a bi porn site, nor did I choose to visit a straight porn site – so why am I being forced to sit through women in gay porn?

Studios are free to produce the content they believe makes them the most money, however they should label this content CORRECTLY, so as to avoid pissing off their consumers. If MEN wants to make man on man sex videos featuring women, that’s fine, but please market such scenes as BISEXUAL PORN, as they’re CLEARLY not gay porn. Gay men are NOT interested in seeing on screen, period! If you are, then you’re clearly into BISEXUAL porn.

Globe Trotter says:

You really need to examine why it’s important for you that gay men be forced to view women in porn. We have ZERO interest in seeing women in our porn, just as gay women have ZERO interest in seeing men in their porn. It doesn’t matter if it’s 1 scene or 1% of the scenes. ZERO means ZERO! And if a gay porn video has women in it, then it should be correctly labeled BI PORN, end of conversation. Those men that want to see women in their porn can then CORRECTLY watch those videos, and us primitive gay men that only want to see men in our videos can be left contented alone with man-on-man porn. Everyone lives happily ever after!

I wonder if you spend just as much time over on lesbian porn sites lecturing the women there why it’s in their best interest to tolerate male cameos in their lesbian porn, and how it’s completely harmless to their psyche and sexuality because it happens so infrequently. Yes, maybe you should also lecture them on choosing the correct porn studios and why they’re wrong for being so “exclusive” in their choices. Then maybe you could rattle off a number of porn studios where they’d be better served, as you clearly know better. Oh yes, why not throw in a few percentage stats to prove your point – women just LOVE that! You’d be celebrated like the coming Messiah and lesbians worldwide would repent from their woman-on-woman exclusive ways! Hallelujah!